the BCS and why its BS

ASU should not be ranked at 4....they have proven themselves better than BC....they SHOULD bew Number 2....ahead of BC..ahead of LSU.


MICHIGAN- back in the Biakabutuka days I was a UM fan. For those few years he played there....now. Michigan lost two games. Understandable. They are still a strong football team. Michigan however lsot to an unranked NOT Division 1 school.


USC- my Trojans <3. How I love them. They play competitive schools. They play a schedule where EVERY team has a chance to go to a bowl game. Even though they lost to Stanford. 1) It ISN'T the biggest upset in college football history and 2) Stanford could play in the Rose Bowl....Appalachian State....not so much.


So, granted USC and MIchigan BOTH lost twice, but for the BCS to put Michigan ahead of a three-loss Auburn, two-loss USC, two-loss 'Bama is stupid. These teams play a tough schedule. Sure they had a bad game...nobody is going to win ALL the TIME...but as far as USC goes....losing two games....one by a touchdown to a top 5 bcs team and the other to a team who yeah sucks but stands a chance of going to the Grandaddy of them all....is stupid...


and putting LSU (although they are a strong team) against this years Sun Devils....lame. LSU barely won the last 2/3 games they played....if USC barely won like that....the BCS would have them out of the top 25 as quickly as you can say BCS.

I know they are struggling a little...I am not asking for USC to be ranked at No. 1...they don't deserve No.1, but I don't think they should be as far down as they are...not when Michigan and Auburn are that much ahead of them.....if Oregon KILLED us...yeah okay, but Oregon beat us by a TOUCHDOWN...it wasn't even a real touchdown....it was SIX points.....



the end.